摘要風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法理論涉及的是刑法體系的應(yīng)變性的面向,而刑法的知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)型關(guān)注的是刑法體系的自主性的面向,兩者在思想基礎(chǔ)、價(jià)值關(guān)注與方法論上均有所不同。風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法理論之于刑法體系的意義,主要在于引入社會(huì)的視角,凸顯刑法體系的應(yīng)變性的要求,提出刑法體系需要實(shí)現(xiàn)與社會(huì)外部環(huán)境的同構(gòu)性發(fā)展的命題。全盤(pán)否定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法理論的立場(chǎng)并不可行,但該理論的確未能實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)理論與刑法理論的有效溝通,也存在沒(méi)有進(jìn)行起碼的體系化的缺陷。風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法理論應(yīng)將自身定位為作為規(guī)范法學(xué)的刑法體系的組成部分,在如何實(shí)現(xiàn)刑法理論與社會(huì)理論之間的溝通上,切實(shí)注意準(zhǔn)確理解和把握風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)理論、合理界定社會(huì)理論與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法理論之間關(guān)系、合理處理經(jīng)驗(yàn)性的實(shí)然與規(guī)范性的應(yīng)然之間的關(guān)系等要求。就風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法理論的體系化問(wèn)題而言,貝克的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)理論與回應(yīng)型法的理論均難以成為可供借鑒的框架,有必要從盧曼的系統(tǒng)理論中汲取靈感,采取功能主義的進(jìn)路,將其運(yùn)用到風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法理論的體系化構(gòu)建之中。The risk law the of law , the in the law is with its .They are in , and .The of the risk law to the law lies in its of the of and the of of the law , the that the law a with the .A to the risk law is not ,but such has some such as to the and law and to out the .The risk law be as a part of the law as the of law and four of be the of the and law .Both Beck's of risk and the mode of law can a for the of the risk law ,so it is to draw from 's風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法理論的反思, it to the of the risk law by of .
免責(zé)聲明:本文系轉(zhuǎn)載自其它媒體,版權(quán)歸原作者所有;旨在傳遞信息,不代表本站的觀(guān)點(diǎn)、立場(chǎng)和對(duì)其真實(shí)性負(fù)責(zé)。如需轉(zhuǎn)載,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系原作者。如果來(lái)源標(biāo)注有誤或侵犯了您的合法權(quán)益等其他原因不想在本站發(fā)布,來(lái)信即刪。
咨詢(xún)電話(huà):18511557866
關(guān)注微信
關(guān)注微信